Thirdly, Rawls thinks that one would not choose the principle of average utility from the original position, because of equality that is given by the original position. The original position holds that justice in an ideal society should be guided by the principle opted by everyone if they were in the original position of equality. The equality in this regard refers to the rights and duties of all rational individuals. This would allow the individuals enjoy the equal basic rights and liberties; thus, they would opt for this position.

Question 3

Pure procedural justice differs from other forms of Justice in significant ways. Pure procedural justice involves the fairness given to an individual, without any compromise on the established processes of justice. In this regard, it involves the justice given to an individual by procedure. In other words, there is no formula in judging how just is reached,...

In this regard, procedural justice attributes fairness in making judgments, within the processes used to resolve disputes. These kinds of justice if often applied in many of the legal proceedings, through the emphasis on the due process of justice. Many countries have embraced the sense of procedural justice. For instance, "fundamental justice" exists in Canada while "procedural fairness" exists in Australia among others.
Rawls thinks "justice as fairness" under the social contract account matches his principles. This is because; it provides a fair and impartial point-of-view on justice, which captures his fundamental principles of justice. In addition, this justice gives people the free will commit themselves to social and political justice, as well as, it consequence. In this regard, the people have an equal platform for justice, and the right to equality is given to all people.